Legal Resolution for Cheque Bounce Disputes
Main Purpose
The client reached out to a criminal lawyer for legal advice and court representation in a cheque bounce disputes case involving their relative. The problem arose when their relative ordered cloth on credit but never received the goods, and a cheque they issued for payment later bounced.
Key Summary
The client’s relative had issued a cheque to pay for cloth that was never delivered. Despite the non-delivery, the supplier tried to cash the cheque, which bounced. As a result, a case was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accusing the relative of bouncing the cheque.
During the call, the lawyer:
- Explained the importance of having legal representation to handle the cheque bounce case properly.
- Outlined the steps needed to defend the relative, including filing a Vakalatnama (to authorise the lawyer to represent them) and applying for anticipatory bail to avoid arrest.
- Confirmed the amount of the cheque involved and assured the client that affordable legal fees would be provided for handling the case.
Next Steps
- The lawyer agreed to send a proposal with fee details and a plan for handling the case.
- The client was asked to send a copy of the summons via WhatsApp.
- A WhatsApp group would be created to keep communication open between the lawyer, the client, and the relative involved.
This case shows how a cheque bounce situation can get complicated when goods are not delivered and emphasises the need for quick legal action to manage the case smoothly.
Conclusion
This case shows how important it is to act quickly in cheque bounce situations, especially when goods aren’t delivered. With the right legal help, the client can resolve the issue and protect their relative from legal trouble.